
Get
Rid of the Nets
BY CAPT. TONY DENSLOW
MEGA BITES CHARTERS
Most
Lake Erie sport fishermen in Ohio support the elimination of commercial
fishing. I’ve been writing for a year about why anglers
want the nets gone. Their reasons vary. Some believe the lake
is too fragile anymore to support netting. They want Lake Erie
to be strictly for sport fishing. Others are furious at the cheating
that goes on in the commercial industry and the recent convictions
for taking more fish than allowed.
I’ve always been against it for this reason: IT DOES NOT
MAKE ECONOMIC SENSE. My argument was that a sport fishing-only
lake would boost the state’s economy. More jobs, more boat
sales, more fishermen, packed restaurants and motels, more tax
money for state and local coffers. The list of benefits seem endless
when you think about it.
Now, I offer further proof to support my stance. According to
a new study by the Great Lakes Commission and the Recreational
Marine Research Center of Michigan State University, the recreational
boating industry generates an estimated $3.5 billion for Ohio’s
economy and supports more than 26,000 jobs.
On the other hand, commercial fishing, with its handful of employees,
offers next to nothing. It’s hardly a blip on the economic
radar. They take, yet put nothing back. Could these boating impact
figures be even stronger with a sport fishing –only lake?
I think so. With netting out of the picture, anglers and recreational
boaters will look at Lake Erie in a more positive light. It will
show the public that Lake Erie’s resources are no longer
for sale and that state officials care about the lake’s
future. Translation: more people will come to the lakeshore.
The new study shows a significant increase in recreational boating’s
impact, as compared to similar data compiled in 1999 by The Ohio
State University. That year, recreational boating’s impact
was set at $1.4 billion in Ohio, with support for 19,500 jobs.
Titled as “Great Lakes Recreational Boating’s Economic
Punch,” the study uses 2003 watercraft registration data
compiled by the U.S. Coast Guard, as well as economic data from
individual states. Ohio had a near record 418,300 registered watercraft
in 2003.
“We know recreational boating is a viable and growing industry
in the region, which explains why Ohio and five other Great Lakes
states are among the top ten states nationally in number of registered
watercraft,” said Sean D. Logan, director of the Ohio Department
of Natural Resources.
The study details the primary and secondary economic impacts generated
by boaters and the boating industry. Primary impacts in Ohio included
$1.96 billion in direct sales of boats, equipment, repairs, insurance
and trip-related expenses such as gasoline, lodging, restaurants
and marina fees. Additionally, researchers added $656 million
in personal income from salaries related to the boating industry
and $939 million in value-added expenditures such as restaurant
suppliers, repair workers and service station employees.
Overall, the recreational boating industry in the eight-state
Great Lakes region directly supported 107,000 jobs and generated
a regional primary economic impact estimated at nearly $16 billion.
Adding in secondary spending effects, the study concluded the
recreational boating industry actually produced a total economic
impact estimated at $34.6 billion and supported 244,000 jobs throughout
the Great Lakes region. I rest my case!
|